Would you like to know how this thing started? Did RAREPEPETRADINGCARDS just copy some idea that was already out there? YES! It started in part as a sarcastic version of SOG Cards. Not that anyone disliked SOG ,in fact no SOG no RARPEPETRADINGCARDS. The counterparty infrastructure had been built out more with the growing popularity of SOG. You can have a look for yourself. Just go into the XCP telegram chat and search for ” “legends of shitcoins”. That was one idea LOG instead of SOG. Then just scroll around there and follow the discussion,or just search for “hey guys I made some rarep pepe cards” to find the first rarepepe card. If anything was copied it was SOG.



2016 Saw the Pump and Pump ofthe RAREPEPE BLOCKCHAIN TRADING community. There were massive ammounts of RAREPEPEBLOCKCHAINTRADINGCARDS created and entered into the directory.Hours spent trading using the rarepepewallet and even more hours waiting for transactions to confirm after haripepe broke the blockchain again. The question remains, can RAREPEPEBLOCKCHAINTRADING survive with a massive volume of new cards every week? The community has gotten out out the pitchforks and yelling that they dont want so many each week. I tend to agree. The question is what , if anything, needs to be done.

There is no equitable way to do it

There is talk of voiting based on pepecash stake, groups of elders and even more somewhat similar options. These are currently being sold as “equitable” or “more equitable”. Let´s have a look at that. What would in practice happen if there was a stake voting system based on how much pepecash you own would be put in place. This would mean that a current private chat of pepecash whales would essentially gain control of card curration. How this is “equitable” humm , well ok it does depend on how much pepecash you hold. It would also put curation into a private chat of pepecash whales of which we dont know who they are, and maybe they dont want to be known. When a card is rejected or a shitty one is let though, who to complain to? Complain too much and we dump on you? At least now we know who to complain to. There is nothing wrong with private chat groups, at all. However the current state of things would put one with unknown people in control of card curation, do we want that? Who is pushing for this solution? Are they in this chat group? Does it matter? Just questions for you to ponder while looking in your rarepepewallet pondering how many more you will need to collect.

How can big investors and the rest of the RAREPEPEBLOCKCHAINCOMMUNITY have a win- win solution?

FEES Rasing the fees to submit a new pepe is a flat fee. It is the same for a pepecash whale or a pepecash pleb. The FEES are collected in PEPECASH this in is a WIN for pepecash whales as they have more retail flow onto the shitcoin exchanges and DEX where PEPECASH is traded. Not only that, we all WIN with more liquidity more PEPECASH, XCP and other RAREPEPEs moving around and higher fees will do just that. But wait that is not all!If you have to pay more for a submission you are going to work harder to make it count. The quality will generaly be better AND there is LESS of an incentive to make 10 new submissions a day as that costs more. This was one of many reason the fees for the auctions were 20% to submit good lots that will sell and not BS. – In the end both the PEPEWHALES and the PEPEPLEBS WIN with higher fees.

Reducing the ammount of submissions allowed per week/month , Cool Off Periods

I think everyone agrees that reducing the ammount of submissions allowed and having cool off periods with NO SUBMISSIONS. Is a good idea. This can be done per executive order right away.


The system is not broken. It just needs some adjustments. Adding new layers to an ALREADY complex system is not needed and will lead to less fun and hurt things. We dont need PEPE-bureaucrats with new complex goverment systems that take hours and hours to maintain and participate in. This will lead down a road of adding more and more complex solutions that are not even needed in the first place. How can a noob even understand such a system. I mean a non shitcoin-bitcoin noob. They can just get a grasp of making a wallet, with some crypto goverment system that stakes or crypto eleders that rotate depending on blocktime of the shitcoin time. Not good solutions.

What to do

Keep doing what you are doing. Write a response on your blog, medium whatever. Let´s not have endless chat discussion about this and instead hammer out concrete points in voice, text or other non chat forms.

Part 2

Standards for PEPECARDS
a rough draft to be added to and edited

a. non divis
b. 100 or more
c. locked
d. Image correct size
2. Rejectzone
a. hardcore porn
b. other random stupid shit to provoke people
like pictures of green people doing anal to frogs
a. Is the art technicaly good, good technique was used yes/no
b. Does the art depect a historical moment in crypto history? yes/no
c. more subjective things



Yes ladies and gentelman you heard it here first. A well known bitcoin thought leader BLOCKED a person AND a website on twitter. The blockage happened after a so called “hit piece” was done by a bitcoin news website. Apparently the article misrepresented the thought leader and bitcoin influencer´s opinon on private blockchains. Given that popular influencers have mega busy schedules it is not always easy to get in touch with them, and they are not known to reply with the quickness, or at all. In this case there was no effort made to contact though. It is a hard knock life for those crypto writers and thought leaders alike. The question remains –

Did the drama end there?

NO of course not.

THIS IS BITCOIN and drama is part of it.


​Inside the Bitcoin community,people talk mad beef on twitter and reddit. Straight talk mixed in with a healthy dose of trolling and hazing usually iron out any problems, at least keeping them from burning. A noticeable lack of communication between news websites has now created a one sided mud throwing drama event fueled by self interest.

Can’t we all just create an echo chamber

The twitter beef blew up all in the twitter feeds (damn they were a rollin) between a Bitcoin influencer, thought leader and fan favorite. The writer told us like it is with the title “Bitcorn Thought Leader U WRONG BOY’ Wat U talkin about Private Blerkkchainz.” The rap was built around the recent twitter beef that lead to drama that lead to a webpage talking shit about another webpage without contacting them about the drama so that we can create more drama.

In Crypto Rag´s opinion, the deal is, as the other Crypto Rag done forgot to get up with anybody they done f*ked it up. Or in other words. In our kind opinion,the crux of the matter is in fact that the writer failed to schedule a reach out confernce with the thought leader PR desk. In that way is the reason for the actons taken place on the social media platform known as twitter to “block” users.


Writing an opinon article is great. They are nice to read and most news sites publish them daily,in fact I have done a whole hell of a ton. So I am in fact an expert in this manner and have now qualfied myself. The problem with the piece in question will now be explained in a way that I have already explained but I need to increase the word count. I know that you are not stupid but I am sorry I will write as if you are.

A) It is not hard to find thought leader influencer´s opinons.

B) Learn how to use email or a phone.

This shit is damn funny, because, in the article’s first paragraph, they a commin out of the launch pad with shit like , “you stupid” which is in fact a misconception of relevancy that could have been cleared up with 25 cents and a payphone. The “trolly” does not seem to be in tech understanding but instead a language and communication issue.

Question: ” is it easy to create a click-bait heading?”
No it is not.

“Editor’s Note: This break down is the truth . It has started debate and debate has positive and negative sides since a debate has people that agree and disagree, children please study this for tomrrows test.”

How to promote your cloud mining or ponzi with bitcoin!


Do you have a cloud mining operation or ponzi scheme that you need to promote?

-Are you falling on deaf ears with all these haters calling what you are promoting a “scam” or calling you other names like scammer?

-Is the program you are promoting as an affilate not getting the referals that you wanted because people do not trust the offer?

-Would you like to leverage new interest in bitcoin but are not sure how?

-Do you need thought leaders and trustworthy people in the bitcoin world to talk about you?

-Do you need the name of what you are promoting mentioned as much as possible?

If you answered


to any of these questions then we have the solution.

First send 5btc – now only 1btc to apihdspbgpsgpspspspi1335


-Send bitcoin to yourself, any large ammount betweet 5 btc and 500 btc. The more the better.
-From another social media account not associated with what you are promoting send a public message similar to this.
“We just send you too much bitcoin by mistake, please do the right thing and send it back! Thanks!”
Do not send the funds back right away.
-Let people retweet and even get a little angry. Make sure that a few crypto mags pick up the story and that it is on reddit and twitter. Get people to do live streams about it, youtube videos ect.
-Suddenly when everyone is calling you a scammer and thief you SEND THE BITCOIN BACK.

Now you are the hero and have gotten a lot of free exposure for the program that you are promoting.

Repeat for better effects